Supreme Court docket says leaked abortion draft is authentic; Roberts orders investigation into leak

Pro-abortion and anti-abortion demonstrators protest outdoors the U.S. Supreme Court docket after the leak of a draft majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito getting ready for a majority of the court docket to overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade abortion rights resolution later this yr, in Washington, U.S., Might 3, 2022. 

Evelyn Hockstein | Reuters

Supreme Courtroom Chief Justice John Roberts on Tuesday confirmed the authenticity of a leaked draft court docket opinion that might toss out longstanding abortion rights, however famous that isn't the court's ultimate choice.

Roberts ordered an investigation into the leaker.

"To the extent this betrayal of the confidences of the Courtroom was intended to undermine the integrity of our operations, it won't succeed," the chief justice stated in a statement. "The work of the Court docket is not going to be affected in any method."

"I've directed the Marshal of the Court to launch an investigation into the source of the leak," Roberts said.

The advance publication of a draft opinion is virtually unprecedented for the high courtroom, the place leaks of any sort are exceedingly rare.

The courtroom shares drafts of opinions internally lengthy before they're issued publicly, Roberts famous, calling it "a routine and important part of the Court docket's confidential deliberative work."

The draft on this high-profile abortion case was created in February, in accordance with Politico, which obtained the opinion.

The justices, regulation clerks and different employees of the court are "intensely loyal to the institution and devoted to the rule of legislation," Roberts said.

"Court employees have an exemplary and important custom of respecting the confidentiality of the judicial process and upholding the belief of the Court. This was a singular and egregious breach of that trust that's an affront to the Court and the group of public servants who work here," he said.

The publication of the draft opinion rocked Washington, triggering waves of shock and fury from Democrats who are now pushing for Congress to immediately codify abortion rights by way of laws.

Republicans decried the leak itself, and many referred to as for the kind of investigation the Roberts introduced late Tuesday morning. The GOP lawmakers who commented on the draft opinion praised it for putting decisions about abortion in the palms of states instead of the federal authorities.

The 98-page draft opinion was penned by Justice Samuel Alito, certainly one of six conservatives on a court docket that has moved sharply to the correct in the wake of the Trump administration.

Alito's draft would toss out the precedent set by the 1973 case Roe v. Wade and reaffirmed in 1992 by Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Those pivotal rulings defend the appropriate to get an abortion earlier than the purpose of fetal viability and require that regulations limiting abortion access don't pose an "undue burden."

Alito wrote: "We hold that Roe and Casey have to be overruled."

The draft of the opinion of the courtroom in Dobbs v. Jackson Ladies's Well being Group would facet with the state of Mississippi in protection of a legislation that might ban almost all abortions after 15 weeks of being pregnant.

Lower federal courts had blocked the law on the grounds that it violates the protections established by the Roe and Casey selections.

This is breaking news. Please test back for updates.