Shell consultant quits, accusing firm of ‘excessive harms’ to environment | Shell

A senior security advisor has quit working with Shell after 11 years, accusing the fossil fuel producer in a bombshell public video of inflicting “extreme harms” to the environment.

Caroline Dennett claimed Shell had a “disregard for climate change dangers” and urged others in the oil and gasoline trade to “stroll away whereas there’s still time”.

The chief, who works for the impartial agency Clout, ended her working relationship with Shell in an open letter to its executives and 1,400 workers. In an accompanying video, posted on LinkedIn, she stated she had stop due to Shell’s “double-talk on climate”.

Dennett accused the oil and fuel firm of “working past the design limits of our planetary methods” and “not putting environmental safety earlier than manufacturing”.

She stated: “Shell’s said security ambition is to ‘do no hurt’ – ‘Aim Zero’, they name it – and it sounds honourable however they're utterly failing on it.

“They know that continued oil and fuel extraction causes excessive harms, to our climate, to our environment and to people. And whatever they are saying, Shell is solely not winding down on fossil fuels.”

Dennett instructed the Guardian she “could not marry these conflicts with my conscience”, adding: “I couldn't carry that any longer, and I’m ready to take care of the results.”

Shell was a “main client” of Dennett’s enterprise, which specialises in evaluating safety procedures in high-risk industries including oil and gasoline production. She started working with Shell within the aftermath of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, which rocked the trade.

“I can no longer work for a corporation that ignores all of the alarms and dismisses the risks of local weather change and ecological collapse,” she mentioned. “As a result of, opposite to Shell’s public expressions around web zero, they don't seem to be winding down on oil and fuel, but planning to explore and extract far more.”

Dennett – a felony justice graduate who has spent her career in research and consultancy – was inspired to stop working with Shell after watching news footage of Extinction Revolt climate protesters urging the corporate’s workers to leave. The motion’s TruthTeller whistleblowing project encourages oil and gas workers to stroll away from the industry.

The guide, who runs internal safety surveys and is based in Weymouth, Dorset, acknowledged she was “privileged” to be able to stroll away and “many people working in fossil gasoline companies just aren’t so lucky”.

She urged Shell’s executives to “look within the mirror and ask themselves in the event that they actually believe their vision for extra oil and gas extraction secures a secure future for humanity”.

In late 2020, several Shell executives in its clean power sector left amid reviews they were pissed off on the pace of Shell’s shift in the direction of greener fuels.

Her announcement comes on the eve of Shell’s AGM in London on Tuesday. Its plans to cut back emissions might be discussed on the assembly the place the Dutch activist group Follow It will push for the company’s insurance policies to be extra per the Paris local weather accord. Shell’s board has told traders to reject the group’s resolution that asks it to set more stringent local weather targets.

The Shell investor Royal London has mentioned it intends to abstain on a vote on the agency’s local weather transition proposals.

The Shell chief government, Ben van Beurden, might experience an investor rebel against his £13.5m pay packet on the AGM after the funding adviser Pirc urged a vote towards it.

Sign up to the every day Business At this time e mail or observe Guardian Business on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

A Shell spokesperson stated: “Be in little question, we are decided to ship on our global strategy to be a net zero firm by 2050 and thousands of our people are working laborious to attain this. We now have set targets for the short, medium and long run, and have each intention of hitting them.

“We’re already investing billions of dollars in low-carbon power, although the world will still want oil and gasoline for many years to come in sectors that can’t be simply decarbonised.”

Shell additionally faces the prospect of a potential windfall tax to fund cuts to household bills after the energy business reported bumper income fuelled by the rise in market prices, prompting opposition events to call on the federal government to bring in a one-off levy.

On Monday, the most important oil and gasoline producer within the North Sea spoke out in opposition to a one-off levy, arguing it will lead to the business approving fewer tasks.

Harbour Vitality’s chief government, Linda Cook, advised the Financial Occasions: “A higher tax burden will make it tougher for brand new oil and gas tasks to meet funding hurdle rates, meaning fewer initiatives shall be sanctioned.

“That is at a time when trade is being encouraged to increase home UK oil and gasoline manufacturing and help an orderly power transition.”

Harbour has informed the federal government it plans to invest $6bn within the North Sea over three years as business makes its case against the tax. The Guardian revealed this month that Cook dinner had acquired a £4.6m “golden hiya” from the agency.