Shell advisor quits, accusing firm of ‘extreme harms’ to atmosphere | Shell

A senior security marketing consultant has give up working with Shell after 11 years, accusing the fossil fuel producer in a bombshell public video of causing “excessive harms” to the atmosphere.

Caroline Dennett claimed Shell had a “disregard for local weather change risks” and urged others within the oil and gasoline trade to “stroll away while there’s nonetheless time”.

The executive, who works for the impartial agency Clout, ended her working relationship with Shell in an open letter to its executives and 1,400 workers. In an accompanying video, posted on LinkedIn, she stated she had stop because of Shell’s “double-talk on local weather”.

Dennett accused the oil and fuel agency of “operating past the design limits of our planetary programs” and “not putting environmental security earlier than manufacturing”.

She stated: “Shell’s said security ambition is to ‘do no harm’ – ‘Aim Zero’, they name it – and it sounds honourable but they're utterly failing on it.

“They know that continued oil and gas extraction causes extreme harms, to our climate, to our environment and to people. And no matter they say, Shell is simply not winding down on fossil fuels.”

Dennett instructed the Guardian she “could not marry these conflicts with my conscience”, adding: “I couldn't carry that any longer, and I’m ready to cope with the consequences.”

Shell was a “main client” of Dennett’s enterprise, which specialises in evaluating security procedures in high-risk industries including oil and fuel manufacturing. She started working with Shell within the aftermath of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, which rocked the business.

“I can not work for a company that ignores all the alarms and dismisses the risks of climate change and ecological collapse,” she mentioned. “As a result of, opposite to Shell’s public expressions round internet zero, they aren't winding down on oil and gas, but planning to explore and extract much more.”

Dennett – a felony justice graduate who has spent her profession in analysis and consultancy – was impressed to cease working with Shell after watching information footage of Extinction Insurrection local weather protesters urging the corporate’s workers to leave. The movement’s TruthTeller whistleblowing venture encourages oil and gasoline workers to stroll away from the industry.

The consultant, who runs inner safety surveys and relies in Weymouth, Dorset, acknowledged she was “privileged” to have the ability to walk away and “many people working in fossil fuel companies just aren’t so lucky”.

She urged Shell’s executives to “look in the mirror and ask themselves if they really believe their imaginative and prescient for extra oil and gasoline extraction secures a safe future for humanity”.

In late 2020, several Shell executives in its clean vitality sector left amid reviews they have been annoyed at the pace of Shell’s shift in direction of greener fuels.

Her announcement comes on the eve of Shell’s AGM in London on Tuesday. Its plans to reduce emissions shall be discussed on the meeting the place the Dutch activist group Follow This can push for the corporate’s insurance policies to be extra in step with the Paris climate accord. Shell’s board has told traders to reject the group’s resolution that asks it to set extra stringent local weather goals.

The Shell investor Royal London has said it intends to abstain on a vote on the agency’s local weather transition proposals.

The Shell chief government, Ben van Beurden, could expertise an investor revolt against his £13.5m pay packet on the AGM after the funding adviser Pirc urged a vote in opposition to it.

Signal as much as the day by day Business At the moment e-mail or observe Guardian Enterprise on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

A Shell spokesperson stated: “Be in no doubt, we're determined to deliver on our global technique to be a net zero company by 2050 and thousands of our persons are working arduous to achieve this. We have now set targets for the quick, medium and long run, and have every intention of hitting them.

“We’re already investing billions of dollars in low-carbon energy, though the world will still want oil and gas for many years to return in sectors that can’t be easily decarbonised.”

Shell also faces the prospect of a potential windfall tax to fund cuts to household payments after the energy industry reported bumper profits fuelled by the rise in market costs, prompting opposition events to call on the government to herald a one-off levy.

On Monday, the biggest oil and fuel producer in the North Sea spoke out in opposition to a one-off levy, arguing it would result in the trade approving fewer initiatives.

Harbour Energy’s chief executive, Linda Prepare dinner, advised the Financial Times: “A better tax burden will make it tougher for brand new oil and gasoline tasks to fulfill funding hurdle charges, which means fewer tasks will probably be sanctioned.

“This is at a time when business is being encouraged to increase domestic UK oil and fuel manufacturing and support an orderly energy transition.”

Harbour has told the federal government it plans to speculate $6bn within the North Sea over three years as industry makes its case against the tax. The Guardian revealed this month that Prepare dinner had obtained a £4.6m “golden hello” from the firm.